AI writing frequently tells us the distilled insight and then demonstrates it. For example:
> “Doing is a way of knowing.”
That's a strong formulation, but it arrives as a polished proposition. A more lived version might first stay with the experience:
> You start writing because you think you know what you mean. Then the sentence refuses to work. You change it, and the problem turns out not to be the sentence. The argument underneath it is wrong. You could not have known that before trying to say it.
Then:
> This is one reason doing matters. Sometimes the work is not merely how an intention becomes an outcome. It is how the intention gets corrected.
That is substantively the same argument, but the thought appears to have been discovered through attention to a phenomenon, rather than generated as an abstract proposition and decorated with an example afterward.